On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 13:17 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Andy, > > On Friday 02 September 2011 10:42:06 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 21:14 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > +AC_ARG_WITH([libudev], > > > > + AS_HELP_STRING([--without-libudev], > > > > + [Ignore presence of libudev and disable it])) > > > > + > > > > +AS_IF([test "x$with_libudev" != "xno"], > > > > + [PKG_CHECK_MODULES(libudev, libudev, have_libudev=yes, > > > > have_libudev=no)], > > > > + [have_libudev=no]) > > > > > > I don't think this works when cross-compiling. > > > > Do you mean pkg-config call? > > Its manual tells us about PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR which might be helpful. > > If I don't set that, pkg-config seems to pick libudev from the host and > consider that libudev is available. Compilation then fails. > > As most users cross-compile libmediactl, I would like to avoid this situation. > Requiring the user to set PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR to habe libudev support is > fine, but I would like the build to succeed out of the box when cross- > compiling without libudev support. Is that possible ? with my patch you run ./configure --without-libudev Would you like opposite: like ./configure (means w/o libudev), ./configure --with-libudev otherwise? -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
