Em 16-08-2011 01:59, Laurent Pinchart escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > On Tuesday 16 August 2011 02:21:09 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Em 15-08-2011 05:45, Laurent Pinchart escreveu: >>>> After having it there properly working and tested independently, we may >>>> consider patches removing V4L2 interfaces that were obsoleted in favor >>>> of using the libv4l implementation, of course using the Kernel way of >>>> deprecating interfaces. But doing it before having it, doesn't make any >>>> sense. >>> >>> Once again we're not trying to remove controls, but expose them >>> differently. >> >> See the comments at the patch series, starting from the patches that >> removes support for S_INPUT. I'm aware that the controls will be exposed >> by both MC and V4L2 API, althrough having ways to expose/hide controls via >> V4L2 API makes patch review a way more complicated than it used to be >> before the MC patches. > > The MC API doesn't expose controls. Controls are still exposed by the V4L2 API > only, but V4L2 can then expose them on subdev nodes in addition to video > nodes. To be clear, when I'm talking about MC, I'm meaning also the subdev nodes API, as a pure V4L2 api application doesn't know anything about them. Regards, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
