Hi Mauro, On Tuesday 16 August 2011 02:21:09 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em 15-08-2011 05:45, Laurent Pinchart escreveu: > >> After having it there properly working and tested independently, we may > >> consider patches removing V4L2 interfaces that were obsoleted in favor > >> of using the libv4l implementation, of course using the Kernel way of > >> deprecating interfaces. But doing it before having it, doesn't make any > >> sense. > > > > Once again we're not trying to remove controls, but expose them > > differently. > > See the comments at the patch series, starting from the patches that > removes support for S_INPUT. I'm aware that the controls will be exposed > by both MC and V4L2 API, althrough having ways to expose/hide controls via > V4L2 API makes patch review a way more complicated than it used to be > before the MC patches. The MC API doesn't expose controls. Controls are still exposed by the V4L2 API only, but V4L2 can then expose them on subdev nodes in addition to video nodes. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
