On Friday, June 03, 2011 21:55:23 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Hans, > > Thanks for the patch. > > On Wednesday 25 May 2011 15:33:49 Hans Verkuil wrote: > > From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > When an application changes a control you want to generate an event. > > However, you want to avoid sending such an event back to the application > > (file handle) that caused the change. > > > > Add the filehandle to the various set control functions. > > To implement per-file handle controls, the get/try functions will need the > file handle as well. Should this patch handle that, or do you want to postpone > it until a driver uses per-file handle controls ? No, this has nothing to do with per-filehandle controls. This filehandle is needed to prevent events from being sent to the filehandle that caused the change (leads to nasty feedback-loops). Since get and try will never raise control events I do not need the filehandle there. It's patches 3/11 and 11/11 that actually add support for per-filehandle controls. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
