Re: Yet another memory provider: can linaro organize a meeting?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Rough schedules.
>
> 1. Warsaw meetings (3/16~3/18): mostly v4l2 person and some SoC vendors
>  Make a consensence at media developers. and share the information.
>  Please note that it's v4l2 brainstorming meeting. so memory
> management is not the main issue.
> 2. ELC (4/11~4/13): DRM, DRI and v4l2 person.

Fyi, I should be at ELC, at least for a day or two.. it would be nice,
as Andy suggested on other thread, to carve out a timeslot to discuss
in advance, because I'm not sure that I'll be able to be there the
entire time..

BR,
-R

>  Discuss GEM/TTM is acceptable for non-X86 system and find out the
> which modules are acceptable.
>  We studied the GEM for our environment. but it's too huge and not
> much benefit for us since current frameworks are enough.
>  The missing is that no generic memory passing mechanism. We need the
> generic memory passing interface. that's all.
> 3. Linaro (5/9~5/13): ARM, SoC vendors and v4l2 persons.
>  I hope several person are anticipated and made a small step for final goal.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux