Em 22-03-2011 06:53, BjÃrn Mork escreveu: > Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:46:23 +0100 Rico Tzschichholz wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I would like to know if there is any intention to include this patch >>>> soon? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/244201/ >>> >>> There are MANY posted but unmerged patches in patchwork from the linux-media >>> mailing list. What is going on (or not going on) with patch merging? >> >> Actually, quite a lot of effort was put in to get that part right. It >> does the reverse thing that's to be done. >> The revamped version is here [1] If the issue persists still, then it >> needs to be investigated further. >> >> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxtv-commits@xxxxxxxxxxx/msg09214.html > > So the patch state should be "Rejected" and not "Under Review". > > Would certainly help us all if the patchwork state was updated whenever > a patch actually was processed... Yes, but the thing is that somebody needs to manually update me about status change, as patchwork doesn't provide any way for it. Patchwork's permission for a project is all or nothing: or you completely own a project, or you have just read-only access. There's no way, currently, for me to delegate a patch to someone without allowing that person to touch at the non-delegated patches. Also, patchwork also doesn't allow me to change contributor status (there's just one global admin that creates and/or modifies account access on patchwork). Anyway, I've updated the status for #244201. Thanks, Mauro. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
