Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:46:23 +0100 Rico Tzschichholz wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like to know if there is any intention to include this patch >>> soon? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/244201/ >> >> There are MANY posted but unmerged patches in patchwork from the linux-media >> mailing list. ÂWhat is going on (or not going on) with patch merging? > > Actually, quite a lot of effort was put in to get that part right. It > does the reverse thing that's to be done. > The revamped version is here [1] If the issue persists still, then it > needs to be investigated further. > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxtv-commits@xxxxxxxxxxx/msg09214.html So the patch state should be "Rejected" and not "Under Review". Would certainly help us all if the patchwork state was updated whenever a patch actually was processed... BjÃrn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
