Re: [patch] Fix AF9015 Dual tuner i2c write failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Switching channels for long time seems to hang device (no errors seen but it does not lock anymore), I don't know why. It is not very easy to reproduce. For me it will take generally few days just tune from channel to channel in loop.

Antti

On 03/05/2011 10:56 AM, Juan Jesús García de Soria Lucena wrote:
Hi, Andrew.

This is what happens to me with both the KWorld dual tuner (when using only
one tuner) and the Avermedia Volar Black (single tuner), both based on
AF9015.

I also got corrupted streams with the KWorld when capturing via both tuners
(the video our the audio would show artifacts in mythtv each several
seconds).

As far as the loss of tuning ability goes, I think it's a problem related to
tuning itself, since it wouldn't happen when you just left a channel tuned
and streaming in a simple client, but would trigger after a random time when
you left mythtv scanning the channels for EIT data.

I don't think it's a problem with a specific HW implementation, since I got
it with both AF9015-based cards. It could be either a chipset quirk our a
bug in the driver.

My informal and quick tests with Windows Media Center and these cards did
not reproduce the problem, when trying to change channels as quickly as
possible, admittedly for not so long a time.

Best regards,
    Juan Jesus.
El 05/03/2011 02:53, "adq"<adq@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  escribió:
On 5 March 2011 01:43, adq<adq@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
On 4 March 2011 23:11, Andrew de Quincey<adq_dvb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
On 4 March 2011 22:59, Antti Palosaari<crope@xxxxxx>  wrote:
On 03/05/2011 12:44 AM, Andrew de Quincey wrote:

Adding a "bus lock" to af9015_i2c_xfer() will not work as
demod/tuner
accesses will take multiple i2c transactions.

Therefore, the following patch overrides the dvb_frontend_ops
functions to add a per-device lock around them: only one frontend
can
now use the i2c bus at a time. Testing with the scripts above shows
this has eliminated the errors.

This have annoyed me too, but since it does not broken functionality
much
I
haven't put much effort for fixing it. I like that fix since it is in
AF9015
driver where it logically belongs to. But it looks still rather
complex.
I
see you have also considered "bus lock" to af9015_i2c_xfer() which
could
be
much smaller in code size (that's I have tried to implement long time
back).

I would like to ask if it possible to check I2C gate open / close
inside
af9015_i2c_xfer() and lock according that? Something like:

Hmm, I did think about that, but I felt overriding the functions was
just cleaner: I felt it was more obvious what it was doing. Doing
exactly this sort of tweaking was one of the main reasons we added
that function overriding feature.

I don't like the idea of returning "error locked by FE" since that'll
mean the tuning will randomly fail sometimes in a way visible to
userspace (unless we change the core dvb_frontend code), which was one
of the things I was trying to avoid. Unless, of course, I've
misunderstood your proposal.

Not returning error, but waiting in lock like that:
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&d->i2c_mutex)<  0)
  return -EAGAIN;

Ah k, sorry

However, looking at the code again, I realise it is possible to
simplify it. Since its only the demod gates that cause a problem, we
only /actually/ need to lock the get_frontend() and set_frontend()
calls.

I don't understand why .get_frontend() causes problem, since it does
not
access tuner at all. It only reads demod registers. The main problem is
(like schema in af9015.c shows) that there is two tuners on same I2C
bus
using same address. And demod gate is only way to open access for
desired
tuner only.

AFAIR /some/ tuner code accesses the tuner hardware to read the exact
tuned frequency back on a get_frontend(); was just being extra
paranoid :)

You should block traffic based of tuner not demod. And I think those
callbacks which are needed for override are tuner driver callbacks.
Consider
situation device goes it v4l-core calls same time both tuner .sleep()
==
problem.

Hmm, yeah, you're right, let me have another look tomorrow.


Hi, must admit I misunderstood your diagram originally, I thought it
was the demods AND the tuners that had the same i2c addresses.

As you say though. its just the tuners, so adding the locking into the
gate ctrl as you suggested makes perfect sense. Attached is v3
implementing this; it seems to be working fine here.


Unfortunately even with this fix, I'm still seeing the problem I was
trying to fix to begin with.

Although I no longer get any i2c errors (or *any* reported errors),
after a bit, one of the frontends just.. stops working. All attempts
to tune it fail. I can even unload and reload the driver module, and
its stuck in the same state, indicating its a problem with the
hardware. :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
http://palosaari.fi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux