Hi, On 31-Jan-25 15:06, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:17:25 +0100 > Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > >> On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 at 12:12, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ricardo, >>> >>> On 31-Jan-25 11:04 AM, Ricardo Ribalda wrote: >>>> Hi Hans >>> >>> Which Hans, me or Hans Verkuil? Since this needs to go out >>> through a fixed pull-request I think it would be best if >>> Hans Verkuil picks up the revert directly in the fixes >>> branch ? >> >> Whoever started in v4l2 later needs to change their name :P. >> >> I was thinking about you this time :) >> >>> >>>> We are seeing a spike of reports with the signature: >>>> >>>> "Found multiple Units with ID XX" >>>> >>>> Could you take a look at this patch? I agree with Thadeu that the best >>>> strategy is to land the revert asap and when the storm disappears work >>>> on a different solution. >>> >>> Ack, Fedora is getting some bug reports about this too. Since both >>> you (Ricardo) and Laurant seemed to be on top of this I didn't take >>> a closer look yet. But this definitely is hitting users and we >>> need to fix this. >>> >>> Since we still don't have a fix yet we really should revert the commit >>> causing this problem ASAP. >> >> Hans (Verkuil) if Hans (de Goede) adds a Reviewed-by or a Acked-by, >> could you take this patch to the media-committers/fixes branch ? > > I can pick it as well. From what I got, Hans de Goede is also ok > with such change. Yes I have just replied to the revert patch with my reviewed-by. Mauro if you can pick this up and send it to Linus soon(ish) that would be great. Can you also please add a Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx tag while merging it? This will need to be backported to kernels which have the troublesome commit. Regards, Hans > > > Thanks, > Mauro >
