Hi André,
On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 11:45:16PM +0100, André Apitzsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, dem 10.12.2024 um 12:34 +0000 schrieb Sakari Ailus:
> > On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 10:19:51PM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
> > wrote:
> > > > > + state =
> > > > > v4l2_subdev_get_locked_active_state(&imx214->sd);
> > > >
> > > > Sakari, I see that other drivers assume that the active is locked
> > > > in
> > > > set_ctrl. Is this correct?
> > >
> > > imx214->sd.state_lock = imx214->ctrls.lock;
> > >
> > > So I guess it is fine :)
> >
> > Yes, it is.
> >
> > Please also run this on the set:
> >
> > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict --max-line-length=80
> >
>
> there are a few lines that exceed 80 columns:
>
> WARNING: line length of 85 exceeds 80 columns
> #163: FILE: drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c:576:
> + imx214_update_pad_format(imx214, mode, &format->format, format->format.code);
> --
> WARNING: line length of 81 exceeds 80 columns
> #88: FILE: drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c:983:
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to set xclk frequency\n");
> --
> WARNING: line length of 82 exceeds 80 columns
> #138: FILE: drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c:1039:
> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register sensor sub-device\n");
> --
> WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns
> #491: FILE: drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c:359:
> + { IMX214_REG_EXCK_FREQ, IMX214_EXCK_FREQ(IMX214_DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ / 1000000) },
> --
> WARNING: line length of 83 exceeds 80 columns
> #177: FILE: drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c:730:
> + exposure_max = format->height + ctrl->val - IMX214_EXPOSURE_OFFSET;
> --
> WARNING: line length of 85 exceeds 80 columns
> #85: FILE: drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c:1231:
> + if (bus_cfg.link_frequencies[i] == IMX214_DEFAULT_LINK_FREQ_LEGACY) {
>
>
> Is the strict 80 columns limit really necessary, as it would decrease
> readability?
For the array that could be the case but I think I'd wrap the rest.
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
