Re: What if add enumerations at the V4L2_FOCUS_MODE_AUTO?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

(CC'ing linux-media this time, please discard the previous mail)

On Tuesday 14 December 2010 12:27:32 Kim, HeungJun wrote:
> Hi Laurent and Hans,
> 
> I am working on V4L2 subdev for M5MOLS by Fujitsu.
> and I wanna listen your comments about Auto Focus mode of my ideas.
> the details is in the following link discussed at the past.
> Although the situation(adding the more various functions at the M5MOLS
> or any other MEGA camera sensor, I worked.)is changed,
> so I wanna continue this threads for now.
> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg03543.html
> 
> First of all, the at least two more mode of auto-focus exists in the
> M5MOLS camera sensor. So, considering defined V4L2 controls and the
> controls in the M5MOLS, I suggest like this:
> 
> +enum  v4l2_focus_auto_type {
> +	V4L2_FOCUS_AUTO_NORMAL = 0,
> +	V4L2_FOCUS_AUTO_MACRO = 1,
> +	V4L2_FOCUS_AUTO_POSITION = 2,
> +};
> +#define V4L2_CID_FOCUS_POSITION			(V4L2_CID_CAMERA_CLASS_BASE+13)
> 
> -#define V4L2_CID_ZOOM_ABSOLUTE			(V4L2_CID_CAMERA_CLASS_BASE+13)
> -#define V4L2_CID_ZOOM_RELATIVE			(V4L2_CID_CAMERA_CLASS_BASE+14)
> +#define V4L2_CID_ZOOM_ABSOLUTE			(V4L2_CID_CAMERA_CLASS_BASE+14)
> +#define V4L2_CID_ZOOM_RELATIVE			(V4L2_CID_CAMERA_CLASS_BASE+15)
> 
> 
> The M5MOLS(or other recent camera sensor) can have at least 2 mode although
> in any cases : *MACRO* and *NORMAL* mode. plus, M5MOLS supports
> positioning focus mode, AKA. POSITION AF mode.
> 
> The MACRO mode scan short range, and this mode can be used at the
> circumstance in the short distance with object and camera lens. So, It has
> fast lens movement, but the command FOCUSING dosen't works well at the
> long distance object.
> 
> On the other hand, NORMAL mode can this. As the words, It's general and
> normal focus mode. The M5MOLS scan fully in the mode.
> 
> In the Position AF mode, the position(expressed x,y) is given at the
> M5MOLS, and then the M5MOLS focus this area. But, the time given the
> position, is normally touch the lcd screen at the mobile device, in my
> case. If the time is given from button, it's no big problem *when*. But,
> in touch-lcd screen case, the position is read at the touch screen driver,
> before command FOCUS to camera sensor. It's the why I add another
> CID(V4L2_CID_FOCUS_POSITION).

I'm pretty sure that some devices would require a rectangle instead of 
coordinates to define the focus point. Even a rectangle might not be enough. 
It would help if we could get feedback from camera designers here.

Hans, should we add a new control type to pass coordinates/rectangles ? :-)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux