On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 05:46:41PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > We currently sleep for 50 ms at the end of each iteration in > ub960_rxport_wait_locks(). This feels a bit excessive, especially as we > always do at least two loops, so there's always at least one sleep, even > if we already have a stable lock. > > Change the sleep to 10 ms. ... > - msleep(50); > + fsleep(10 * 1000); USEC_PER_MSEC Can also a comment be added on top of this call to explain the choice? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
