UB9702 has the refclk freq register at a different offset than UB960,
but the code uses the UB960's offset for both chips. Fix this.
The refclk freq is only used for a debug print, so there's no functional
change here.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: afe267f2d368 ("media: i2c: add DS90UB960 driver")
---
drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
index ffe5f25f8647..b1e848678218 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
@@ -352,6 +352,8 @@
#define UB960_SR_I2C_RX_ID(n) (0xf8 + (n)) /* < UB960_FPD_RX_NPORTS */
+#define UB9702_SR_REFCLK_FREQ 0x3d
+
/* Indirect register blocks */
#define UB960_IND_TARGET_PAT_GEN 0x00
#define UB960_IND_TARGET_RX_ANA(n) (0x01 + (n))
@@ -3837,7 +3839,10 @@ static int ub960_enable_core_hw(struct ub960_data *priv)
if (ret)
goto err_pd_gpio;
- ret = ub960_read(priv, UB960_XR_REFCLK_FREQ, &refclk_freq);
+ if (priv->hw_data->is_ub9702)
+ ret = ub960_read(priv, UB9702_SR_REFCLK_FREQ, &refclk_freq);
+ else
+ ret = ub960_read(priv, UB960_XR_REFCLK_FREQ, &refclk_freq);
if (ret)
goto err_pd_gpio;
--
2.43.0
