Hi Sakari and Laurent, On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 7:57 PM Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 08:48:19PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 03:45:26PM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > Hi Prabhakar, > > > > > > Thanks for the set. It looks largely very nice to me, after addressing > > > Laurent's comments. A few comments here and possibly on other patches... > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 06:06:10PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote: > > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Implement the .get_frame_desc() subdev operation to report information > > > > about streams to the connected CSI-2 receiver. This is required to let > > > > the CSI-2 receiver driver know about virtual channels and data types for > > > > each stream. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c > > > > index 7f1133292ffc..c24eb6e7a7b5 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c > > > > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > > > > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> > > > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > > > #include <linux/types.h> > > > > +#include <media/mipi-csi2.h> > > > > #include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h> > > > > #include <media/v4l2-event.h> > > > > #include <media/v4l2-fwnode.h> > > > > @@ -829,6 +830,32 @@ static const struct v4l2_ctrl_ops ov5645_ctrl_ops = { > > > > .s_ctrl = ov5645_s_ctrl, > > > > }; > > > > > > > > +static int ov5645_get_frame_desc(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, unsigned int pad, > > > > + struct v4l2_mbus_frame_desc *fd) > > > > +{ > > > > + const struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *fmt; > > > > + struct v4l2_subdev_state *state; > > > > + > > > > + if (pad != OV5645_PAD_SOURCE) > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > > As you have a single source pad, and pretty much all sensor drivers will, I > > > think it'd be nice to add a check for this (that it's not an internal pad) > > > to the caller side in v4l2-subdev.c. And of course drop this one. > > > > What check would you add, just verifying that the pad is a source pad ? > > I think you could add that, too, besides the absence of the internal flag. > Checking only for the source flag should suffice, as the MEDIA_PAD_FL_INTERNAL flag cannot be set for a source pad because media_entity_pads_init() enforces this restriction. Do you agree? Cheers, Prabhakar