Hi Hans,
On Monday 22 November 2010 10:08:06 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday, November 22, 2010 00:35:54 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > I forgot to answer one of your comments.
> >
> > On Wednesday 17 November 2010 01:31:15 Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > +static unsigned int media_poll(struct file *filp,
> > > > + struct poll_table_struct *poll)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct media_devnode *mdev = media_devnode_data(filp);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!mdev->fops->poll || !media_devnode_is_registered(mdev))
> > > > + return DEFAULT_POLLMASK;
> > > > + return mdev->fops->poll(filp, poll);
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > If it's not registered, I would expect poll() to return an error.
> >
> > Agreed. I'll return POLLERR | POLLHUP in that case. Is that fine with you
> > ?
>
> When I looked at this for the core code I decided to just return POLLERR.
I've copied the usbdevfs code which returns POLLERR | POLLHUP when devices are
disconnected.
> That seemed to be what the majority of other usb drivers do. ALSA returns
> POLLERR | POLLNVAL, by the way, which I think is a poor choice.
Indeed, POLLNVAL has a clear semantics that doesn't apply here.
> This doesn't really seem to be standardized :-(
CC'ing LKML with the question.
POLLERR | POLLHUP and POLLERR won't make a difference to select(), but we
should still standardize on a poll() return code when devices are unregistered
and/or - for hot-pluggable devices - disconnected (for V4L devices
unregistered usually means disconnected) ?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
