On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:59:43PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >Em 18-11-2010 18:49, Jarod Wilson escreveu: >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:43:19PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:33:04AM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: >>>> Mauro's suggestion, iirc, was that max scancode size should be a >>>> property of the keytable uploaded, and something set at load time (and >>>> probably exposed as a sysfs node, similar to protocols). >>> >>> I think that would be a step in the wrong direction. It would make the >>> keytables less flexible while providing no real advantages. > >We can't simply just change NEC to 32 bits, as we'll break userspace ABI >(as current NEC keycode tables use only 16 bits). So, an old table will not >worky anymore, if we do such change. The idea was to do the conversion from <whatever> to 32 bits in get/setkeycode. -- David Härdeman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
