Hi Hans, On Friday 19 November 2010 14:42:31 Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Friday 19 November 2010 14:26:42 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Some buggy sensors generate corrupt frames when the stream is started. > > This new operation returns the number of corrupt frames to skip when > > starting the stream. > > Looks OK, but perhaps the two should be combined to one function? I'm fine with both. Guennadi, any opinion ? > I also have my doubts about the sensor_ops in general. I expected > originally to see a lot of ops here, but apparently there is little or no > need for it. > > Do we expect to see this grow, or would it make more sense to move the ops > to video_ops? I'd be interested to hear what sensor specialists think. Good question. It won't remove the need for the g_skip_frames operation, but it's certainly worth asking. Standards are emerging for sensors in specific markets (SMIA comes to mind - I'm not sure if the spec is public, but some information can be found online) and there will probably be a need to provide more sensor information to both "bridge" drivers and userspace applications in the future. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
