Hi Biju, > I think it is different here. That 1 msec is delay associated with > applying hardware power see [1] Okay, ack. > I will restore it. Thanks! I had meanwhile another thought. What if we kind of merge the two patches, so the outcome is basically this: In ov5645_set_register_array: If (settings->reg == 0x3008 && settings->val == 0x82) usleep_range(1000, 2000) ? Then, we don't need to split the array and we are also future proof if we ever need to set the reset bit again somewhere else. Bonus points for replacing 0x82 with a define :) What do you think? Happy hacking, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
