Hello, On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 05:58:42PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 08:51:51AM +0000, Sean Young wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 04:16:16PM +0000, Sean Young wrote: > > > The pwm-ir-tx driver has to turn the pwm signal on and off, and suffers > > > from delays as this is done in process context. Make this work in atomic > > > context. > > > > Hi Uwe, > > > > Do you have any comments on this series? > > > > I hope you don't dislike the pwm_apply_atomic()/pwm_apply_cansleep(), I am > > not wedded to this name, it's just me reading the room and thinking that > > would be the most acceptable to everyone - I may have misread this. > > > > Thank you for any feedback > > I didn't find much time to look into it. Skimming over it, I like it. > I'll take a deeper look soon. Great, thanks! No rush just wanted to make sure it wasn't forgotten. Sean
