Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Improve pwm-ir-tx precision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 08:51:51AM +0000, Sean Young wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 04:16:16PM +0000, Sean Young wrote:
> > The pwm-ir-tx driver has to turn the pwm signal on and off, and suffers
> > from delays as this is done in process context. Make this work in atomic
> > context.
> 
> Hi Uwe,
> 
> Do you have any comments on this series?
> 
> I hope you don't dislike the pwm_apply_atomic()/pwm_apply_cansleep(), I am
> not wedded to this name, it's just me reading the room and thinking that
> would be the most acceptable to everyone - I may have misread this.
> 
> Thank you for any feedback

I didn't find much time to look into it. Skimming over it, I like it.
I'll take a deeper look soon.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux