On 04/08/2023 22:17, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 4.08.2023 23:12, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 04/08/2023 22:10, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
Would it not be more legitimate and logical to have 8350 use 8280xp's frequency table, instead of 8250 ?
top freq is higher on 8280
Still though its a bit suspicious 8350 doesn't have its own table.
Are we missing the downstream reference ?
8250:
qcom,allowed-clock-rates = <239999999 338000000 366000000 444000000>;
8350:
qcom,allowed-clock-rates = <239999999 338000000 366000000 444000000>;
(identical)
Konrad
Fair enough
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
