Hi Guennadi, On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 18:41:09 +0200 (CEST), Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Hm, maybe testing patches between packing and completing a thousand of > other things was not a very good idea... In any case, I think, it has been > something in my rootfs. Can it be, that modules, loaded per modalias and > per explicit module names interact differently with module blacklists? > That would explain the different behaviour, that I've been observing. As far as I know, blacklisting only affects alias-based module loading. Explicit module loading isn't affected by blacklisting. This is one more good reason to use module aliases where possible, BTW... Respecting user-defined blacklisting is desirable. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
