Hi Bryan,
Thank you for your comments.
On 2023/7/26 18:55, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 19/06/2023 12:28, Jack Zhu wrote:
>
>> +static int stfcamss_of_parse_ports(struct stfcamss *stfcamss)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = stfcamss->dev;
>> + struct device_node *node = NULL;
>> + int ret, num_subdevs = 0;
>> +
>> + for_each_endpoint_of_node(dev->of_node, node) {
>> + struct stfcamss_async_subdev *csd;
>> +
>> + if (!of_device_is_available(node))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + csd = v4l2_async_nf_add_fwnode_remote(&stfcamss->notifier,
>> + of_fwnode_handle(node),
>> + struct stfcamss_async_subdev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(csd)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(csd);
>> + goto err_cleanup;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = stfcamss_of_parse_endpoint_node(dev, node, csd);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto err_cleanup;
>> +
>> + num_subdevs++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return num_subdevs;
>> +
>> +err_cleanup:
>> + of_node_put(node);
>
> Where is the _get() for this and if you are releasing it on the error path when is the _get() released on the non-error path ?
>
OK, I will fix it.
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stfcamss_subdev_notifier_bound(struct v4l2_async_notifier *async,
>> + struct v4l2_subdev *subdev,
>> + struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
>> +{
>> + struct media_pad *pad[STF_PADS_NUM];
>> + unsigned int i, pad_num = 0;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < pad_num; ++i) {
>
> Does this loop ever run ?
> I don't see how it can..
>
OK, I will fix it, although there are modifications to this code in patch 5 and patch 6.
> ---
> bod
--
Regards,
Jack Zhu
