Hi,
On 7/6/23 15:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 2:29 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 7/6/23 11:19, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 11:30:07PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> Some ACPI glue code (1) may want to do an acpi_device_id match while
>>>> it only has a struct acpi_device available because the first physical
>>>> node may not have been instantiated yet.
>>>>
>>>> Add a new acpi_match_acpi_device() helper for this, which takes
>>>> a "struct acpi_device *" as argument rather then the "struct device *"
>>>> which acpi_match_device() takes.
>>>>
>>>> 1) E.g. code which parses ACPI tables to transforms them
>>>> into more standard kernel data structures like fwnodes
>>>
>>> Looks like it's v1 of my original patch, anyway this is now in Linux Next as
>>> 2b5ae9604949 ("ACPI: bus: Introduce acpi_match_acpi_device() helper").
>>
>> Ah interesting, it does indeed look a lot like your version.
>> but it was developed independently.
>>
>> Unfortunately it seems that this is headed for 6.6-rc1 and the atomisp
>> changes in this series which rely on this are intended for 6.6-rc1 too.
>
> No, the material Andy is talking about will be pushed for 6.5-rc1
> (probably even today), because it is part of a fix for systems that
> are broken in the field.
>
>> So we still need to figure out how to merge this.
>
> This shouldn't be a problem.
Great, thank you.
Regards,
Hans
