On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 2:29 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 7/6/23 11:19, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 11:30:07PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Some ACPI glue code (1) may want to do an acpi_device_id match while
> >> it only has a struct acpi_device available because the first physical
> >> node may not have been instantiated yet.
> >>
> >> Add a new acpi_match_acpi_device() helper for this, which takes
> >> a "struct acpi_device *" as argument rather then the "struct device *"
> >> which acpi_match_device() takes.
> >>
> >> 1) E.g. code which parses ACPI tables to transforms them
> >> into more standard kernel data structures like fwnodes
> >
> > Looks like it's v1 of my original patch, anyway this is now in Linux Next as
> > 2b5ae9604949 ("ACPI: bus: Introduce acpi_match_acpi_device() helper").
>
> Ah interesting, it does indeed look a lot like your version.
> but it was developed independently.
>
> Unfortunately it seems that this is headed for 6.6-rc1 and the atomisp
> changes in this series which rely on this are intended for 6.6-rc1 too.
No, the material Andy is talking about will be pushed for 6.5-rc1
(probably even today), because it is part of a fix for systems that
are broken in the field.
> So we still need to figure out how to merge this.
This shouldn't be a problem.
