Am Donnerstag, den 30.09.2010, 00:08 -0300 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab: > Em 29-09-2010 22:04, hermann pitton escreveu: > > > > Linus, > > > > Am Montag, den 27.09.2010, 17:02 -0700 schrieb Linus Torvalds: > >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > >> <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> The following changes since commit 32163f4b2cef28a5aab8b226ffecfc6379a53786: > >>> > >>> alpha: fix usp value in multithreaded coredumps (2010-09-25 14:38:13 -0700) > >>> > >>> are available in the git repository at: > >>> ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-2.6.git v4l_for_linus > >> > >> I get > >> > >> scripts/kconfig/conf --oldconfig arch/x86/Kconfig > >> drivers/media/Kconfig:146: 'endif' in different file than 'if' > >> drivers/media/IR/Kconfig:15: location of the 'if' > >> drivers/Kconfig:114: unexpected 'endmenu' within if block > >> drivers/Kconfig:1: missing end statement for this entry > >> make[1]: *** [oldconfig] Error 1 > >> make: *** [oldconfig] Error 2 > >> > >> with this. And it seems to be due to a totally broken commit at the > >> very beginning of the series by a commit called "Kconfig fixes" > >> (Hah!), that clearly has not been tested at all. > >> > >> The commit sequence was also done today, apparently immediately before > >> sending me the pull request. Which sure as hell explains the "clearly > >> not tested at all" situation. > >> > >> Don't do this. You are now officially on my shit-list for sending me > >> total crap. > >> > >> How effing hard can it be to understand: you don't send me stuff that > >> hasn't been tested. It needs to be in -next for SEVERAL DAYS, and you > >> don't rebase it or take it from some random quilt series just before > >> sending it to me. > >> > >> That's true _especially_ during the -rc series. But it's damn well > >> true at any other time too. > >> > >> I'm angry. I expect at least some _minimal_ amount of competence from > >> people I pull from. This was not it. Get your ^&#! act together! > >> > >> Linus > > > > you should not be such rude. > > > > You have never been in any hardware details on v4l and dvb. > > > > After Gerd Knorr did quit, out of reasons, you noticed there is some > > noise on v4l and dvb, but you never had to fix much on your own in the > > last eight years. > > > > Shouting around and blaming others always was enough ... > > > > I agree, a rc-1 should be at least compile tested. > > > > Any idea, why this goes away? > > Hermann, > > That's OK. I did crap. Linus is right. I'll send him the patches again > after having the same tree branch being tested for a few days at linux-next, > without any bad results. > > Cheers, > Mauro. Mauro, hopefully, a few days on linux-next can replace all what we had in the past, causing sometimes years of delay ... What to say ? OK, if you say we are fine with it now, it is up to you. So, the whole mistake was, that Linus did not start kicking asses harder earlier? What a total crap! Cheers, Hermann -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
