Em 29-09-2010 22:04, hermann pitton escreveu: > > Linus, > > Am Montag, den 27.09.2010, 17:02 -0700 schrieb Linus Torvalds: >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab >> <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> The following changes since commit 32163f4b2cef28a5aab8b226ffecfc6379a53786: >>> >>> alpha: fix usp value in multithreaded coredumps (2010-09-25 14:38:13 -0700) >>> >>> are available in the git repository at: >>> ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-2.6.git v4l_for_linus >> >> I get >> >> scripts/kconfig/conf --oldconfig arch/x86/Kconfig >> drivers/media/Kconfig:146: 'endif' in different file than 'if' >> drivers/media/IR/Kconfig:15: location of the 'if' >> drivers/Kconfig:114: unexpected 'endmenu' within if block >> drivers/Kconfig:1: missing end statement for this entry >> make[1]: *** [oldconfig] Error 1 >> make: *** [oldconfig] Error 2 >> >> with this. And it seems to be due to a totally broken commit at the >> very beginning of the series by a commit called "Kconfig fixes" >> (Hah!), that clearly has not been tested at all. >> >> The commit sequence was also done today, apparently immediately before >> sending me the pull request. Which sure as hell explains the "clearly >> not tested at all" situation. >> >> Don't do this. You are now officially on my shit-list for sending me >> total crap. >> >> How effing hard can it be to understand: you don't send me stuff that >> hasn't been tested. It needs to be in -next for SEVERAL DAYS, and you >> don't rebase it or take it from some random quilt series just before >> sending it to me. >> >> That's true _especially_ during the -rc series. But it's damn well >> true at any other time too. >> >> I'm angry. I expect at least some _minimal_ amount of competence from >> people I pull from. This was not it. Get your ^&#! act together! >> >> Linus > > you should not be such rude. > > You have never been in any hardware details on v4l and dvb. > > After Gerd Knorr did quit, out of reasons, you noticed there is some > noise on v4l and dvb, but you never had to fix much on your own in the > last eight years. > > Shouting around and blaming others always was enough ... > > I agree, a rc-1 should be at least compile tested. > > Any idea, why this goes away? Hermann, That's OK. I did crap. Linus is right. I'll send him the patches again after having the same tree branch being tested for a few days at linux-next, without any bad results. Cheers, Mauro. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
