Re: [PATCH] Illuminators and status LED controls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, September 13, 2010 09:04:18 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> 
> On Thursday 09 September 2010 13:48:58 Hans de Goede wrote:
> > On 09/09/2010 03:29 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > >> On 09/09/2010 08:55 AM, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> > >>> "Hans" == Hans Verkuil<hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx>   writes:
> > >>> 
> > >>> I originally was in favor of controlling these through v4l as well, but
> > >>> people made some good arguments against that. The main one being: why
> > >>> would you want to show these as a control? What is the end user supposed
> > >>> to do with them? It makes little sense.
> 
> Status LEDs reflect in glasses, making annoying color dots on webcam pictures. 
> That's why Logitech allows to turn the status LED off on its webcams.

That's a really good argument. I didn't think of that one.

I'm happy with a menu control for LEDs, something like:

Auto (default)
Off

and possibly:

On
Blink

Although I'm not so sure we need/want these last two.

It should be a control since otherwise v4l2 apps would need to add support for
the LED interface just for this, whereas if it is a control it will 'just work'.

I think it is up to the driver whether it wants to implement the LED interface
as well.

Regards,

	Hans

> 
> [snip]
> 
> > >> Reading this whole thread I have to agree that if we are going to expose
> > >> camera status LEDs it would be done through the sysfs API. I think this
> > >> can be done nicely for gspca based drivers (as we can put all the "crud"
> > >> in the gspca core having to do it only once), but that is a low priority
> > >> nice to have thingy.
> > >> 
> > >> This does leave us with the problem of logitech uvc cams where the LED
> > >> currently is exposed as a v4l2 control.
> > > 
> > > Is it possible for the uvc driver to detect and use a LED control? That's
> > > how I would expect this to work, but I know that uvc is a bit of a
> > > strange beast.
> > 
> > Unfortunately no, some uvc cameras have "proprietary" controls. The uvc
> > driver knows nothing about these but offers an API to map these to v4l2
> > controls (where userspace tells it the v4l2 cid, type, min, max, etc.).
> > 
> > Currently on logitech cameras the userspace tools if installed will map
> > the led control to a private v4l2 menu control with the following options:
> > On
> > Off
> > Auto
> > Blink
> > 
> > The cameras default to auto, where the led is turned on when video
> > is being streamed and off when there is no streaming going on.
> 
> I confirm this. If the UVC LED controls were standard the driver could expose 
> them through a LED-specific API. As UVC allows devices to implement private 
> controls, the driver needs to expose all those private controls (both LED and 
> non-LED) through the same API.
> 
> 

-- 
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG, part of Cisco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux