On 20.03.23 10:42, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 20.03.23 10:32, Sakari Ailus wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:18:23AM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >>> On 07.02.23 17:40, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:13:12PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> The runtime suspend/resume functions are only referenced from the >>>>> dev_pm_ops, but they use the old SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper >>>>> that requires a __maybe_unused annotation to avoid a warning: >>>>> >>>>> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1082:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_resume' [-Werror,-Wunused-function] >>>>> static int imx290_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >>>>> ^ >>>>> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1090:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_suspend' [-Werror,-Wunused-function] >>>>> static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >>>>> ^ >>>>> >>> >>> I might be missing something (if so, please tell me), but to me it looks >>> this fix for a build issue in 6.3-rc (which shows up in Guenters weekly >>> reports to Linus) didn't make any progress in the past few weeks. Is >>> there a reason why? Who actually needs to pick it up and send it towards >>> mainline? Manivannan Sadhasivam? Sakari Ailus? >> >> Mauro has recently pulled my PR including this and I understand it's in >> Mauro's tree now. > > Ahh, great, many thx. > > I checked Linux-next before writing my mail, but didn't sport it there. :-/ Argh, ohh no, it's there. Sorry for the noise. Second time something like this happens today. Seems today is not my best day. :-/ Ciao, Thorsten
