On 20.03.23 10:32, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:18:23AM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >> On 07.02.23 17:40, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:13:12PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> The runtime suspend/resume functions are only referenced from the >>>> dev_pm_ops, but they use the old SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper >>>> that requires a __maybe_unused annotation to avoid a warning: >>>> >>>> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1082:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_resume' [-Werror,-Wunused-function] >>>> static int imx290_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >>>> ^ >>>> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1090:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_suspend' [-Werror,-Wunused-function] >>>> static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >>>> ^ >>>> >> >> I might be missing something (if so, please tell me), but to me it looks >> this fix for a build issue in 6.3-rc (which shows up in Guenters weekly >> reports to Linus) didn't make any progress in the past few weeks. Is >> there a reason why? Who actually needs to pick it up and send it towards >> mainline? Manivannan Sadhasivam? Sakari Ailus? > > Mauro has recently pulled my PR including this and I understand it's in > Mauro's tree now. Ahh, great, many thx. I checked Linux-next before writing my mail, but didn't sport it there. :-/ Ciao, Thorsten
