On 08/03/2023 12:03, Jack Zhu wrote: > > > On 2023/3/8 18:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 07/03/2023 10:46, Jack Zhu wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2023/3/3 16:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On 02/03/2023 10:19, jack.zhu wrote: >>>>> Add Kconfig and Makefie, update platform/Kconfig and platform/Makefile >>>>> to enable building of the Starfive Camera subsystem driver. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: jack.zhu <jack.zhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/media/platform/Kconfig | 1 + >>>>> drivers/media/platform/Makefile | 1 + >>>>> drivers/media/platform/starfive/Kconfig | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> drivers/media/platform/starfive/Makefile | 14 ++++++++++++++ >>>> >>>> This is not a separate commit. If it were, it would mean you just added >>>> dead code in previous commits, so why adding dead code in first place? >>>> >>> >>> The previous patches are made according to the module function.I think >>> it is helpful to explain the composition of the code file. >>> >>> stf_camss[patch 9] as a platform device manages all resources including >>> ISP and VIN. ISP/VIN [patch 7/8]as a sub-device needs to access other >>> resources managed by stf_camss.There is mutual reference between them. >>> Therefore, this patch is used for the overall compilation of the starfive >>> directory. >> >> So previous code is dead? Again, what is the reason for adding dead >> code? Mutual reference is not the answer. >> > > Maybe I need to merge the previous patches[6-11] into one patch to submit? I gave you the recommendation in my first reply. What's wrong with it? Best regards, Krzysztof