On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 12:20:54AM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > Also in the future I think I should make the > ir_raw_event_store_with_filter the default submit function for all > drivers, and then I could drop that silly '_with_filter" thing > (Couldn't think for a better name for this function...) I agree. Perhaps it would even be possible to merge ir_raw_event_store_with_filter and ir_raw_event_store. The automatic merger of consecutive pulse-pulse events or space-space events should help simplify some drivers... > > Wouldn't DEFINE_RAW_EVENT(ev); be more in line with the kernel > > coding style? (cf. DEFINE_MUTEX, DEFINE_SPINLOCK, etc). > Of course, nothing against that. DEFINE_RC_RAW_EVENT() is probably better by the way... -- David Härdeman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
