Hi Andy,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:10:58PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Dunno what happened to my previous reply to this. Okay, trying again...
>
> + Cc: Petr, Sergey
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 05:27:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Use acpi_fwnode_handle() instead of dereferencing an fwnode handle directly,
> > which is a better coding practice.
>
> It appears that this series depends on fd070e8ceb90 ("test_printf: Refactor
> fwnode_pointer() to make it more readable") which is in PRINTK tree.
>
> Sakari, Mauro, if you are okay to route this via that tree, can we get your
> tags for that? Otherwise we need to postpone this till v6.2-rc1 (but I would
> like to decrease the chances to appear a new user of the to be removed API).
>
> Note, that Greg Acked v1 of the swnode patches (which are the same in v2).
Sorry for the late reply. Feel free to do that if it's not too late, with:
Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I don't think the linkelihood for having a new user for this API is high.
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
