Dunno what happened to my previous reply to this. Okay, trying again...
+ Cc: Petr, Sergey
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 05:27:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Use acpi_fwnode_handle() instead of dereferencing an fwnode handle directly,
> which is a better coding practice.
It appears that this series depends on fd070e8ceb90 ("test_printf: Refactor
fwnode_pointer() to make it more readable") which is in PRINTK tree.
Sakari, Mauro, if you are okay to route this via that tree, can we get your
tags for that? Otherwise we need to postpone this till v6.2-rc1 (but I would
like to decrease the chances to appear a new user of the to be removed API).
Note, that Greg Acked v1 of the swnode patches (which are the same in v2).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
