RE: [Patch v4 2/3] media: s5p-mfc: Add variant data for MFC v7 hardware for Exynos 3250 SoC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Krzysztof,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 14 November 2022 13:22
> To: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@xxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx; andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx;
> mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx; hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx;
> ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxxx;
> benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> stanimir.varbanov@xxxxxxxxxx; dillon.minfei@xxxxxxxxx;
> david.plowman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx;
> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; andi@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx; aswani.reddy@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx; smitha.t@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Patch v4 2/3] media: s5p-mfc: Add variant data for MFC v7
> hardware for Exynos 3250 SoC
> 
> On 14/11/2022 06:46, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
> > commit "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" which adds mfc v7 support for
> 
> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings.
> 
Do you mean warnings on "5441e9dafdfc6dc40fa" commit? Or on this patch?
 
I am running like this :  ./scripts/checkpatch.pl patch_file, it does not show any warnings.

or am I missing anything while running checkpatch on the current patch?

> > Exynos3250 and use the same compatible string as used by
> > Exynos5240 but both the IPs are a bit different in terms of IP clock.
> > Lets add variant driver data based on the new compatible string
> 
> Just "Add variant"
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux