Hello, On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:44 AM, VDR User <user.vdr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf > <dougsland@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hello Derek, >> >> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab >> <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Em 03-08-2010 03:44, VDR User escreveu: >>>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:36 PM, VDR User <user.vdr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Any idea when this will be fixed? >>> >>> It is up to Douglas to do the backport, but you can just use the latest >>> git tree, where those patches are applied already at 2.6.35, at the >>> branch staging/v2.6.36. >> >> I am already working to give a full update to hg tree. Sorry this problem. > > Hi Douglas, thanks for the update! I'll pass the word along to other > users I know who are wondering as well but who don't use the mailing > list. > > A little off topic but IIRC wasn't there some talk about writing new > scripts to main keep hg more up-to-date? If so, was that ever > started? Otherwise, my apologies if I'm not remembering correctly. We have a script to check if hg is synced to git tree, to extract sequence of patches from git tree, etc.. but not like this yet. Some time ago I and Mauro discussed about create a script to apply patches automatically (of course, those witch doesn't break and need a backport manually) but I think it will became true with this new git tree schema that Mauro implemented a few days ago which reduces the number of branches to follow. Cheers Douglas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
