Friday 30 July 2010 20:49:05 Janusz Krzysztofik napisał(a): > Friday 30 July 2010 13:07:42 Guennadi Liakhovetski napisał(a): > > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > > > This is a V4L2 driver for TI OMAP1 SoC camera interface. > > > > > > Two versions of the driver are provided, using either > > > videobuf-dma-contig or videobuf-dma-sg. The former uses less processing > > > power, but often fails to allocate contignuous buffer memory. The > > > latter is free of this problem, but generates tens of DMA interrupts > > > per frame. > > > > Hm, would it be difficult to first try contig, and if it fails - fall > > back to sg? > > Hmm, let me think about it. Hi Gennadi, For me, your idea of frist trying contig and then falling back to sg if it fails, sounds great. However, I'm not sure if implementing it at a specific hardware driver level is a good solution. Nor soc_camera framework seems the right place for it either. I think the right way would be if implemented at the videobuf-core level. Then, drivers should be able to initialize both paths, providing queue callbacks for both sets of methods, contig and sg, for videobuf sole use. I'm not sure if I have enough skills to implement this idea. However, if there is a consensus on its general usfullness as a videobuf extension, I can have a look at it in my spare time. For now, I'd propose limiting my changes for v2 to splitting both methods into separate sections, not interleaved with #ifdefs like they are now, as you've already suggested. Thanks, Janusz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
