Hi Laurent,
Thanks for the review.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 01:44:02AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 06:36:54PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > The bus_info or a similar field exists in a lot of structs, yet drivers
> > tend to set the value of that field by themselves in a determinable way.
> > Thus provide a helper for doing this. To be used in subsequent patches.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/media/media-device.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/media/media-device.h b/include/media/media-device.h
> > index 1345e6da688a..9f0458068196 100644
> > --- a/include/media/media-device.h
> > +++ b/include/media/media-device.h
> > @@ -13,12 +13,13 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/list.h>
> > #include <linux/mutex.h>
> > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >
> > #include <media/media-devnode.h>
> > #include <media/media-entity.h>
> >
> > struct ida;
> > -struct device;
> > struct media_device;
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -181,8 +182,7 @@ struct media_device {
> > atomic_t request_id;
> > };
> >
> > -/* We don't need to include pci.h or usb.h here */
> > -struct pci_dev;
> > +/* We don't need to include usb.h here */
> > struct usb_device;
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MEDIA_CONTROLLER
> > @@ -496,4 +496,28 @@ static inline void __media_device_usb_init(struct media_device *mdev,
> > #define media_device_usb_init(mdev, udev, name) \
> > __media_device_usb_init(mdev, udev, name, KBUILD_MODNAME)
> >
> > +static inline void
> > +__media_set_bus_info(char *bus_info, size_t bus_info_size, struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + if (!dev || *bus_info)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (dev_is_platform(dev))
> > + snprintf(bus_info, bus_info_size, "platform:%s", dev_name(dev));
> > + else if (dev_is_pci(dev))
> > + snprintf(bus_info, bus_info_size, "PCI:%s", dev_name(dev));
> > +}
>
> Does this have to be inline ?
Not necessarily. But we'll need a new module if it isn't --- this code will
be needed in both MC and V4L2 separately.
>
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * media_set_bus_info() - Conditionally set bus_info
> > + *
> > + * @bus_info: Variable where to write the bus info (char array)
> > + * @dev: Related struct device
> > + *
> > + * Sets bus information based on device conditionally, if the first character of
> > + * &bus_info is not '\0' and dev is non-NULL.
> > + */
> > +#define media_set_bus_info(bus_info, dev) \
> > + __media_set_bus_info(bus_info, sizeof(bus_info), dev)
>
> I like the idea, but if the bus_info passed to the macro is a char *
> instead of a char[], I think this will still compile, with
> sizeof(bus_info) not giving the expected value. Could we either get a
> compilation failure in that case, of maybe turn this into two inline
> functions, one for media_device and the other one for v4l2_capability,
> that would both call __media_set_bus_info() ? The latter may be better.
The latter, yes. There will be so few users that's entirely fine.
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
