Am Dienstag, dem 21.12.2021 um 18:33 +0100 schrieb Martin Kepplinger: > Am Montag, dem 29.11.2021 um 13:07 +0100 schrieb Martin Kepplinger: > > From: Angus Ainslie <angus@xxxxxxxx> > > > > Allow the dw9714 to control a regulator and adjust suspend() and > > resume() > > to support both runtime and system pm. > > > > Signed-off-by: Angus Ainslie <angus@xxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > > > revision history > > ---------------- > > v3: (thank you Mark and Sakari) > > * use regulator_get() instead of regulator_get_optional() > > > > v2: (thank you Mark) > > * simplify the regulator_get_optional() error path > > * fix regulator usage during probe() > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20211126090107.1243558-1-martin.kepplinger@xxxxxxx/ > > > > v1: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20211125080922.978583-1-martin.kepplinger@xxxxxxx/ > > > > > > > > drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c > > b/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c > > index 3863dfeb8293..81170bbe0e55 100644 > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/dw9714.c > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > > #include <linux/i2c.h> > > #include <linux/module.h> > > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > > +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> > > #include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h> > > #include <media/v4l2-device.h> > > #include <media/v4l2-event.h> > > @@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ struct dw9714_device { > > struct v4l2_ctrl_handler ctrls_vcm; > > struct v4l2_subdev sd; > > u16 current_val; > > + struct regulator *vcc; > > }; > > > > static inline struct dw9714_device *to_dw9714_vcm(struct v4l2_ctrl > > *ctrl) > > @@ -145,6 +147,16 @@ static int dw9714_probe(struct i2c_client > > *client) > > if (dw9714_dev == NULL) > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > + dw9714_dev->vcc = devm_regulator_get(&client->dev, "vcc"); > > + if (IS_ERR(dw9714_dev->vcc)) > > + return PTR_ERR(dw9714_dev->vcc); > > + > > + rval = regulator_enable(dw9714_dev->vcc); > > + if (rval < 0) { > > + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to enable vcc: %d\n", > > rval); > > + return rval; > > + } > > + > > v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&dw9714_dev->sd, client, &dw9714_ops); > > dw9714_dev->sd.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE | > > V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS; > > @@ -200,6 +212,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused > > dw9714_vcm_suspend(struct device *dev) > > struct dw9714_device *dw9714_dev = sd_to_dw9714_vcm(sd); > > int ret, val; > > > > + if (pm_runtime_suspended(&client->dev)) > > + return 0; > > + > > for (val = dw9714_dev->current_val & ~(DW9714_CTRL_STEPS - > > 1); > > val >= 0; val -= DW9714_CTRL_STEPS) { > > ret = dw9714_i2c_write(client, > > @@ -208,7 +223,12 @@ static int __maybe_unused > > dw9714_vcm_suspend(struct device *dev) > > dev_err_once(dev, "%s I2C failure: %d", > > __func__, ret); > > usleep_range(DW9714_CTRL_DELAY_US, > > DW9714_CTRL_DELAY_US + 10); > > } > > - return 0; > > + > > + ret = regulator_disable(dw9714_dev->vcc); > > + if (ret) > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to disable vcc: %d\n", ret); > > + > > + return ret; > > } > > > > /* > > @@ -224,6 +244,16 @@ static int __maybe_unused > > dw9714_vcm_resume(struct device *dev) > > struct dw9714_device *dw9714_dev = sd_to_dw9714_vcm(sd); > > int ret, val; > > > > + if (pm_runtime_suspended(&client->dev)) > > + return 0; > > + > > + ret = regulator_enable(dw9714_dev->vcc); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable vcc: %d\n", ret); > > + return ret; > > + } > > + usleep_range(1000, 2000); > > + > > for (val = dw9714_dev->current_val % DW9714_CTRL_STEPS; > > val < dw9714_dev->current_val + DW9714_CTRL_STEPS - 1; > > val += DW9714_CTRL_STEPS) { > > hi Sakari and all interested, > > any objection to this addition? I run it for a long time now. > > thank you, > > martin > > hi all, patchwork marked this as "changes requested": https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20211129120754.1766570-1-martin.kepplinger@xxxxxxx/ I'm not aware of changes you wish to this. What do you think? thank you, martin
