Hi Norman, Le dimanche 24 octobre 2021 à 13:16 +0200, Norman Koch a écrit : > Hello, > > I'm not sure if I'm correct to ask this here, sorry if it's not. The linux-media mailing relates to the media subsystem, which deals with support for video capture, video output (non-display), CEC, CODECs, TV tuners of many kinds, etc. I believe linux-nfs might be a better place for this. > > I use Debian 11 with 5.10.0-8-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.46-4 (2021-08-03) > x86_64 GNU/Linux as Kernel on a ThinkPad T440. I also have a network > attached storage device which I access over nfs. I load it via > > //192.168.0.103/fileserver /home/norman/fileserver cifs > auto,rw,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,uid=1000,gid=1000,defaults,iocharset=utf8,username=<HERECOMESMYUSERNAME>,password=<HERECOMESMYPASSWORD>,vers=1.0 > 0 0 > > in my fstab. It all works fine if I start using it while I am at my > docking station (with LAN-cable to my router and IP 192.168.0.109), but > it fails to access (and even re-mount and umount, when not using umount > -a -t cifs -l) on wifi (having 192.168.0.102 there). But when I umount > before unplugging, and then unplug and re-mout, it works just fine. > > When I am in the situations that it doesn't work, all windows keep stuck > and I cannot interact with them anymore, if have anything at all to do > with my NAS (even ls ~, because it's mounted in ~). > > I am not a kernel programmer, so I cannot look into the source code to > tell why this happens, but I can speculate. I believe the NFS-driver is > somehow linked to the interface it was first connected on. So that, if > you connect on enp0s25 first, then plug it out, and try to access the > same host (the NAS) when enp0s25 is down, it fails to do something, and > there seems to be no timeout set by default that prevents the system > from crashing. So in short: use the IP so long as it works, but if it > doesn't, use the MAC-address to arp-scan the network, maybe you're on a > different port now. > > Is this reasonable? > > If this is the wrong mailing list, I'm very sorry. I'd like to be > corrected on where to send this to be dealt this properly. > > Thanks, > > Norman > >
