On 21.10.2021 13:10, Kieran Bingham wrote:
- To: Updated Andrzej's e-mail address
Thx for update :)
Quoting Uwe Kleine-König (2021-10-21 07:25:47)
A driver with a remove callback that just returns 0 behaves identically
to a driver with no remove callback at all. So simplify accordingly.
Looks fine to me though.
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards
Andrzej
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/i2c/s5c73m3/s5c73m3-spi.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/s5c73m3/s5c73m3-spi.c b/drivers/media/i2c/s5c73m3/s5c73m3-spi.c
index c102c6bbc118..7fe61187a2f8 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/s5c73m3/s5c73m3-spi.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/s5c73m3/s5c73m3-spi.c
@@ -130,16 +130,10 @@ static int s5c73m3_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
return 0;
}
-static int s5c73m3_spi_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
int s5c73m3_register_spi_driver(struct s5c73m3 *state)
{
struct spi_driver *spidrv = &state->spidrv;
- spidrv->remove = s5c73m3_spi_remove;
spidrv->probe = s5c73m3_spi_probe;
spidrv->driver.name = S5C73M3_SPI_DRV_NAME;
spidrv->driver.of_match_table = s5c73m3_spi_ids;
--
2.30.2