On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:47:36AM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote: > Hi Qing, > > Quoting Qing Wang (2021-10-20 03:14:15) > > show() should not use snprintf() when formatting the value to be > > returned to user space. > > > > Fix the following coccicheck warning: > > drivers/media/i2c/ccs/ccs-core.c:3761: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf. > > > > V3: > > - Fix some formatting problems. > > This could go below the --- so that it doesn't get entered into the > commit itself, but I suspect that can be handled while applying. Not > sure what the preferences are for that. You're right in saying it needs to be after '---' line. But no need to resend for that. > > Anyway, thank you for updating with my suggestions. > > Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Qing Wang <wangqing@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/media/i2c/ccs/ccs-core.c | 12 ++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ccs/ccs-core.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ccs/ccs-core.c > > index 5363f3b..9158d3c > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ccs/ccs-core.c > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ccs/ccs-core.c > > @@ -2758,13 +2758,13 @@ ident_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) > > struct ccs_module_info *minfo = &sensor->minfo; > > > > if (minfo->mipi_manufacturer_id) > > - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%4.4x%4.4x%2.2x\n", > > - minfo->mipi_manufacturer_id, minfo->model_id, > > - minfo->revision_number) + 1; > > + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%4.4x%4.4x%2.2x\n", > > + minfo->mipi_manufacturer_id, minfo->model_id, > > + minfo->revision_number) + 1; > > else > > - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%2.2x%4.4x%2.2x\n", > > - minfo->smia_manufacturer_id, minfo->model_id, > > - minfo->revision_number) + 1; > > + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%2.2x%4.4x%2.2x\n", > > + minfo->smia_manufacturer_id, minfo->model_id, > > + minfo->revision_number) + 1; > > } > > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(ident); > > > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > -- Sakari Ailus
