On (21/07/26 13:22), Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > I guess ->flags can become u8 for both create-bufs and req-bufs.
> > > We had ->flags in both structs as u32, but then decided to leave
> > > some reserved[] space in req-bufs and switched to u8 there.
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-create-bufs.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-create-bufs.rst
> > index a048a9f6b7b6..cf633b5a4919 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-create-bufs.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-create-bufs.rst
> > @@ -112,13 +112,13 @@ than the number requested.
> > other changes, then set ``count`` to 0, ``memory`` to
> > ``V4L2_MEMORY_MMAP`` and ``format.type`` to the buffer type.
> >
> > - * - __u32
> > + * - __u8
> > - ``flags``
> > - Specifies additional buffer management attributes.
> > See :ref:`memory-flags`.
> >
> > - * - __u32
> > - - ``reserved``\ [6]
> > + * - __u8
> > + - ``reserved``\ [27]
> > - A place holder for future extensions. Drivers and applications
> > must set the array to zero.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> > index 6edf4508c636..2ae949ec0afa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> > @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ static void fill_buf_caps(struct vb2_queue *q, u32 *caps)
> >
> > static void validate_memory_flags(struct vb2_queue *q,
> > int memory,
> > - u32 *flags)
> > + u8 *flags)
> > {
> > if (!q->allow_cache_hints || memory != V4L2_MEMORY_MMAP) {
> > /*
> > @@ -711,11 +711,9 @@ static void validate_memory_flags(struct vb2_queue *q,
> > int vb2_reqbufs(struct vb2_queue *q, struct v4l2_requestbuffers *req)
> > {
> > int ret = vb2_verify_memory_type(q, req->memory, req->type);
> > - u32 flags = req->flags;
> >
> > fill_buf_caps(q, &req->capabilities);
> > - validate_memory_flags(q, req->memory, &flags);
> > - req->flags = flags;
> > + validate_memory_flags(q, req->memory, &req->flags);
> > return ret ? ret : vb2_core_reqbufs(q, req->memory,
> > req->flags, &req->count);
> > }
> > @@ -990,11 +988,9 @@ int vb2_ioctl_reqbufs(struct file *file, void *priv,
> > {
> > struct video_device *vdev = video_devdata(file);
> > int res = vb2_verify_memory_type(vdev->queue, p->memory, p->type);
> > - u32 flags = p->flags;
> >
> > fill_buf_caps(vdev->queue, &p->capabilities);
> > - validate_memory_flags(vdev->queue, p->memory, &flags);
> > - p->flags = flags;
> > + validate_memory_flags(vdev->queue, p->memory, &p->flags);
> > if (res)
> > return res;
> > if (vb2_queue_is_busy(vdev, file))
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
> > index 7973aa0465d2..ad4f7cee53f2 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
> > @@ -2513,8 +2513,8 @@ struct v4l2_create_buffers {
> > __u32 memory;
> > struct v4l2_format format;
> > __u32 capabilities;
> > - __u32 flags;
> > - __u32 reserved[6];
> > + __u8 flags;
> > + __u8 reserved[27];
> > };
> >
> > /*
>
> I don't think we want this UABI churn anymore for a trivial
> simplification in the implementation.
OK, I can scratch it. I thought that for API symmetry we can have
::memory-flags of the same type/size in create-bufs and req-bufs,
but don't have any strong opinion on this.
