On Wednesday 26 May 2010 17:47:57 Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to add my "RFC: a processing plugin API for libv4l" to the > schedule, see the mail I just send. This actually is one of the main > reasons for me to come to the summit. OK, I'll add it. I'll post an update topic list this weekend. Regards, Hans > Thanks & Regards, > > Hans > > > On 05/23/2010 12:36 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This is a tentative agenda for the Helsinki mini-summit on June 14-16. > > > > Please reply to this thread if you have comments or want to add topics. > > > > The overall layout of the summit is to use the first day to go through all > > topics and either come to a conclusion quickly for the 'simple' topics, or > > discuss enough so that everyone understands the problem for the more complex > > issues. > > > > The second day will be used for in-depth discussions on those complex topics > > and on the third day we will go through all topics again and translate the > > discussions into something concrete like a time-line, action items, etc. > > > > We have a lot to discuss, so we may have to split the second day into two > > 'tracks', each discussing different topics. I hope it is not needed, but I > > fear we may have no choice. If we do split up, then one track will touch on > > the videobuf-related topics and the other on the remaining topics. > > > > The first day will also feature a few short presentations on various topics. > > Presentations shouldn't be longer than, say, 10 minutes. These presentations > > are meant to get everyone up to speed quickly. > > > > After each topic I've put the names of the main developers active in that area. > > If you see your name, then make sure you know the status of that topic so you > > can explain it to everyone else. If I think it warrants a presentation, then I > > will mention that. Of course, if you disagree, or want/don't want to do a > > presentation then just say so. It's a tentative agenda only. > > > > The topics below are in no particular order except for the first one. I am > > very pleased that Qualcomm has joined this project so I think it would be > > nice to start the meeting off with a presentation on their HW architecture. > > > > 1) Presentation on the Qualcomm video hw architecture. Most of us have no > > experience with Qualcomm hardware, so I've asked Jeff Zhong to give a short > > overview of their video hardware. > > > > 2) Removal of V4L1: status of driver conversion in the kernel, status of > > moving v4l1->v4l2 conversion into libv4l1. What needs to be done, when > > will it be done and who will do it. Driver conversion: Hans Verkuil, > > libv4l1 conversion: Hans de Goede. > > > > 3) videobuf/videobuf2: what are the shortcomings, what are the requirements for > > a 'proper' videobuf implementation, can the existing videobuf be fixed or do > > we need a videobuf2. If the latter, what would be needed to convert existing > > drivers over to a videobuf2. Laurent Pinchart and Pawel Osciak. This I'm sure > > requires a presentation. > > > > 4) Multi-planar support. Pawel Osciak. > > > > 5) Media Controller Roadmap. Laurent Pinchart. This probably warrants a short > > presentation. > > > > 6) TO DO list regarding V4L2 core framework including the new control framework. > > Hans Verkuil. Will be a presentation. > > > > 7) Status of the Texas Instruments drivers: omapX (Hiremath Vaibhav) and DMxxxx > > (Sergio Aguirre). Probably should be a short presentation. > > > > 8) soc-camera status. Particularly with regards to the remaining soc-camera > > dependencies in sensor drivers. Guennadi Liakhovetski. > > > > 9) Driver compliance. We need a framework for V4L2 driver compliance. Hans > > Verkuil. > > > > 10) Discuss list of 'reference' programs to test against. Mauro? > > > > 11) Adopting old V4L1 programs and converting to V4L2. Hans de Goede? > > > > 12) Status of intel drivers. Xiaolin Zhang. > > > > It is my understanding that we will also have X11 and gstreamer experts on hand. > > Topics relating to that are welcome. > > > > During the memory handling brainstorming session earlier this year we also > > touched on creating some sort of a generic buffer model allowing for easy > > exchange between v4l buffers, framebuffers, texture buffers, etc. It is my > > opinion that we should not discuss this in Helsinki. The list of topics is > > already quite long and I think it is too early to start working on that. We > > probably need another brainstorming session first in order to come up with > > a reasonable proposal. > > > > Comments? Topics I missed? > > > > Regards, > > > > Hans > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG, part of Cisco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
