Hi Mauro, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Media maintainers need a SoB in order to be able to review, as > driver review takes a lot of time and efforts from reviewers, and > the time they spend reviewing a driver prevents them to do their > (paid) work. Then how do you propose we solve the problem? For example, how about a declaration: that if somebody is working on a driver (in this case) and has actually presented a (possibly not yet mergeable) patch, then versions of this code from other people will not be accepted at the same time instead. Please note that I don't mean abandoned code, I mean a code which simply needs some work and thus a bit of time. Those other people can always apply their changes once the original code is accepted, right? And the changes may get a chance to be examined :-) Or is it too much? > That's said, on a very quick check, it sounds that this driver requires > some work. For instance, it is based on an v4l2_subdev_pad_config, > which was recently replaced upstream. Well, TBH drivers/media is a fast moving target... But it's something. I will obviously update this when I'm back from vacation. Thanks. -- Krzysztof Hałasa Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz Przemysłowy Instytut Automatyki i Pomiarów PIAP Al. Jerozolimskie 202, 02-486 Warszawa
