Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > hermann pitton wrote: > >>> My view is that the backport tree is very useful to have a broader number >>> of people testing V4L/DVB code, as it can be applied against legacy kernels. >>> Of course, for this to work, people should quickly fix broken backports >>> (that means that not only Douglas should work on it, but other developers >>> are welcomed to contribute with backport fixes). >> For now, if not using git, Sander needs a 2.6.33 with recent v4l-dvb >> then to provide relevant debug output and eventually patches. > > Until Douglas or someone fix the breakages with older kernels, yes. As the fix patch is really trivial, I found a couple of minutes to write a patch for fixing this issue. I haven't test the patch, but, as it uses the same backport logic as found at cx2355-ir, I don't expect much troubles on it. -- Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
