Em Mon, 8 Feb 2021 12:41:42 +0100 Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > If you do, instead: > > > > > > if VIDEO_V4L2 && I2C > > > config VIDEO_MAX9271_SERIALIZER > > > tristate > > > > > > config VIDEO_RDACM20 > > > select VIDEO_MAX9271_SERIALIZER > > > ... > > > > > > config VIDEO_RDACM21 > > > select VIDEO_MAX9271_SERIALIZER > > > ... > > > endif > > > > > > Then you also won't need: > > > depends on VIDEO_MAX9271_SERIALIZER || !VIDEO_MAX9271_SERIALIZER > > > > > > As select should do the right thing in this case, ensuring that MAX9271 > > > will be builtin either if RDACM20 or RDACM21 is builtin. > > > > I also vote for usage of "select". > > > > I would prefer that too, I was concerned about possible un-met > dependencies, as Sakari pointed out, but the current situation is no > better, as the only Kconfig symbols where those can be listed are the > camera modules one. Works for me. I'll make a patch for it. Thanks, Mauro
