On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 12:23, Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 11:37:50AM +0000, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> > Hi Maxime
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 13:47, Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > While the BCM2835 had the CEC clock derived from the HSM clock, the
> > > BCM2711 has a dedicated parent clock for it.
> > >
> > > Let's introduce a separate clock for it so that we can handle both
> > > cases.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.h | 1 +
> > > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> > > index b93ee3e26e2b..0debd22bc992 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> > > @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static void vc4_hdmi_cec_update_clk_div(struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi)
> > > * Set the clock divider: the hsm_clock rate and this divider
> > > * setting will give a 40 kHz CEC clock.
> > > */
> > > - clk_cnt = clk_get_rate(vc4_hdmi->hsm_clock) / CEC_CLOCK_FREQ;
> > > + clk_cnt = clk_get_rate(vc4_hdmi->cec_clock) / CEC_CLOCK_FREQ;
> > > value |= clk_cnt << VC4_HDMI_CEC_DIV_CLK_CNT_SHIFT;
> > > HDMI_WRITE(HDMI_CEC_CNTRL_1, value);
> > > }
> > > @@ -1740,6 +1740,7 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_init_resources(struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi)
> > > return PTR_ERR(vc4_hdmi->hsm_clock);
> > > }
> > > vc4_hdmi->audio_clock = vc4_hdmi->hsm_clock;
> > > + vc4_hdmi->cec_clock = vc4_hdmi->hsm_clock;
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -1833,6 +1834,12 @@ static int vc5_hdmi_init_resources(struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi)
> > > return PTR_ERR(vc4_hdmi->audio_clock);
> > > }
> > >
> > > + vc4_hdmi->cec_clock = devm_clk_get(dev, "cec");
> > > + if (IS_ERR(vc4_hdmi->cec_clock)) {
> > > + DRM_ERROR("Failed to get CEC clock\n");
> > > + return PTR_ERR(vc4_hdmi->cec_clock);
> > > + }
> >
> > Aren't we adding to the DT binding here and breaking backwards compatibility?
> > Admittedly CEC didn't work before (and was masked out) for vc5, but do
> > we need to worry about those with existing DT files that currently
> > work happily?
>
> The DT compatibility is not a worry here: I made sure the CEC clock and
> range were part of the binding since it's been introduced:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2e3725b05b785e73482a194b99bff3d5a1c85140
>
> So we were not using it so far, but it was in the DT all along
I guess I should have read it then :-)
In which case
Reviewed-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
