Hi Laurent
On 30/11/2020 16:12, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 06:11:52PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:15PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
>>> Registering software_nodes with the .parent member set to point to a
>>> currently unregistered software_node has the potential for problems,
>>> so enforce parent -> child ordering in arrays passed to this function.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since RFC v3:
>>>
>>> Patch introduced
>>>
>>> drivers/base/swnode.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c
>>> index 615a0c93e116..af7930b3679e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c
>>> @@ -700,14 +700,21 @@ int software_node_register_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes)
>>> int i;
>>>
>>> for (i = 0; nodes[i].name; i++) {
>>> + if (nodes[i].parent)
>>> + if (!software_node_to_swnode(nodes[i].parent)) {
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>> + goto err_unregister_nodes;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> ret = software_node_register(&nodes[i]);
>>> - if (ret) {
>>> - software_node_unregister_nodes(nodes);
>>> - return ret;
>>> - }
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto err_unregister_nodes;
>>> }
>>>
>>> return 0;
>> I'd add a blank line here.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> I spoke a bit too soon. Could you update the documentation of the
> function to explain this new requirement ?
Oops - of course, will do
>>> +err_unregister_nodes:
>>> + software_node_unregister_nodes(nodes);
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_register_nodes);
>>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Laurent Pinchart
