Hi Daniel,
Thank you for the patch.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:15PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> Registering software_nodes with the .parent member set to point to a
> currently unregistered software_node has the potential for problems,
> so enforce parent -> child ordering in arrays passed to this function.
>
> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since RFC v3:
>
> Patch introduced
>
> drivers/base/swnode.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c
> index 615a0c93e116..af7930b3679e 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c
> @@ -700,14 +700,21 @@ int software_node_register_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes)
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; nodes[i].name; i++) {
> + if (nodes[i].parent)
> + if (!software_node_to_swnode(nodes[i].parent)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_unregister_nodes;
> + }
> +
> ret = software_node_register(&nodes[i]);
> - if (ret) {
> - software_node_unregister_nodes(nodes);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_unregister_nodes;
> }
>
> return 0;
I'd add a blank line here.
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +err_unregister_nodes:
> + software_node_unregister_nodes(nodes);
> + return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_register_nodes);
>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
